English Morphology
2025-01-14
Valency
Number of arguments that a verb takes.
Some arguments are not mandatory (though they often are).
Example: eat
Note that prepositional phrases are not necessary to the meaning of the verb, therefore they are not arguments. Syntactically speaking, these are adjuncts.
However, languages have -to different extents- morphological mechanisms to change the valency of the verb
This way, we can e.g. turn a transitive verb into an intransitive one, or vice versa.
Clitics are neither affixes nor free morphemes:
They form one single phonological word with an adjacent word (host)
’ll is the contracted form of will, and ’d the contraction of would.
Note that these may also attach to other word categories:
Clitics may appear before or after the host
In English, forms such as ’ll or ’d are examples of simple clitics, which are unaccented variants of free morphem es and appear in the same position as the free word would
Special clitics also depend on a host, but they are not reduced forms of independent words. Though it may appear written apart from the host, they cannot form a phonological word.
Compound consisting of phrase + noun:
Some languages may express things morphologically, which means they deploy inflection or derivation mechanisms to convey meaning
Ganar-e-mos
win-FUT-1.PL
Other languages, while still being able to convey the same meaning, might have to do so periphrastically: English We will win is the equivalent of Ganaremos
Morphology and syntax are not fully independent from each other
Morphology may affect the syntax of a sentence by changing the valency of the verb
Some phenomena may blur the line between morphology and syntax, such as clitics, phrasal verbs, and phrasal compounds
Some languages may have several mechanisms that allow for morphological expression of meaning, while others do so periphrastically
English Morphology | Week 11: The morphology-syntax interface | Barrientos